# Purpose of this Blog
SAP has started recommending Account Based CO-PA in S/4HANA products (S/4HANA and S/4HANA Finance) based on three main innovations (COGS split, variance posting Categories wise, and additional quantity fields) in Account Based CO-PA. We need to understand first if these three things were only missing in Account Based CO-PA earlier, and because of it all the organizations (at least all manufacturing org.) were using Costing Based CO-PA and SAP also used to recommend Costing Based CO-PA before advent of S/4HANA products or there was more? Let’s find out.
Secondly I have always liked SAP Controlling over SAP Finance and this is the area where I have been more comfortable. I realised that I have written more blogs on S/4 HANA Finance than S/4 HANA Management Accounting. Trying to balance out with this.
Fairly, we will cover below items:
- Understanding of costing based CO-PA and account based CO-PA
- Actual Data in COPA
- Planning Data in COPA
- What’s New in S/4HANA
- Comparison Between Costing Based and Account Based CO-PA and much more
# Comparison Between Costing Based and Account Based CO-PA
This comparison table is for them who just skim and don’t go into the details, rest can go through entire article.
# Basic Concept of COPA
The basic concepts of CO-PA include the following:
Characteristics are those entities that you want to report on. These include divisions, regions, products, and customers.
Note: In addition to the fixed characteristics, up to 50 non-fixed characteristics can be added to an operating concern. So use them wisely. Refer SAP Note. 10293911029391.
Characteristic values are the values that the characteristics in your report should display. For example, region is a characteristic with south as its value, and company code is a characteristic with 1000 as its value.
Profitability segments are the technical definitions of combinations of several characteristics and their values. For example, a combination of North region, T-F100 product, and Sales Rep Miller.
- Value Fields (Costing Based COPA)
Value fields are the amount and quantity fields with which performance can be measured and analysed. Examples include gross sales, surcharges, discounts, and cost of sales.
Note: Maximum 200 values fields can be created, so use them wisely. Refer SAP Note. 10293911029391.
- Cost Elements (Account Based COPA)
Cost Elements plays similar role account based COPA as Value fields in costing based COPA. Amount and quantity fields with which performance can be measured and analysed are posted to account based COPA through Cost Elements.
# Data Structure and COPA Tables
Copy the required characteristics and value fields (applicable for costing-based CO-PA) to the operating concern, save them, and activate the data structures. With activating the data structures, all the necessary tables are created. When assigning characteristics and value fields, activation is required. Otherwise the assignment will be lost.
During the generation process, the system creates the tables CE1XXXX through CE8XXXX
Note that the data in costing-based Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) is stored in separate tables, and the data for account-based CO-PA is stored in the same tables as the other Controlling (CO)modules.
# COPA – Actual Data
Revenues and discounts are transferred to profitability segments in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) at the point of billing in sales order management.
The value fields in the costing-based CO-PA contain the amounts and quantities that you want to report on. The value fields represent the finest level of detail at which costs and revenues are broken down. One of the most important tasks in Customizing for the costing-based CO-PA is to assign your costs and revenues to the required value fields. This assignment enables you to calculate the contribution margins that your organization requires in Information System. Contribution margin can also be analysed in account-based CO-PA. This analyses the COGS (using define splitting scheme) and also the different variance categories (using define Accounts for Splitting Price Differences).
# Top Down Distribution
Top-down distribution of actual data is a periodic function. This function enables you to distribute the aggregated data to extensive levels (such as the division level or the customer level in CO-PA), based on reference information (such as the data from the previous year).
Periodic valuation is only available in costing-based CO-PA. It requires Material Ledger (ML), which is automatically activated in SAP S/4 HANA
The actual costing, which previously could only be performed after a final closed period, can now be transferred to costing-based CO-PA after the actual costing run. This function does not update the FI-Table ACDOCA.
Note: Actual top-down distribution cannot be performed across business areas.
# COPA – Plan Data
The Integrated Business Planning (IBP) for SAP Simple Finance applications provide a consistent view of the planning process. From the UI perspective, all planning applications can be accessed by a Microsoft Excel front-end to provide a homogeneous look and feel. There are no longer silos for the planning data. All planning data is now contained in a real-time info cube of the local Business Warehouse (BW), which is optimized for SAP HANA. Actual data and master data are accessed directly in real time without any replication that would be necessary in a standalone BW.
In costing-based CO-PA, you use the SAP Fiori apps for planning. The data is updated in the CO-PA tables.
In actual release 1610, you cannot transfer the data to FI GL and Profit Center Accounting (PCA) in New GL.
In account-based CO-PA, the plan data is updated in tables COEJ (plan line items) and COSP (plan total).
# Bottom Up Planning
Plan values are planned bottom-up, and merging of plan values can occur in several steps. For example, the default plan values can be created automatically (copied or revaluated) and then used as a plan basis for individual sales representatives.
Integrated Microsoft Excel allows sales representatives to create their sales plan data locally.
Finally, the individual plans can be merged into a single version and valuated with the operative prices and costs of goods manufactured.
# What’s New in S/4HANA
There are some glaring changes in S/4HANA in regard to account based CO-PA, mentioned below.
- Define Accounts for Splitting the Cost of Goods Sold
In this Customizing activity, you can refine the settings for changes in inventory or COGS postings to split the amount and post it to different accounts according to the cost components that are used in the underlying costing sheet. The respective cost component amount is then used for the corresponding journal entry line item.
Path: IMG → Financial Accounting (New) → General Ledger Accounting (New) → Periodic Processing → Integration → Materials Management→ Define Accounts for Splitting the Cost of goods sold.
2. Define Accounts for Splitting Price Differences
This customizing helps in posting production variances as per variances categories.
Path: IMG → Financial Accounting (New) → General Ledger Accounting (New) → Periodic Processing → Integration → Materials Management→ Define Accounts for Splitting the Cost of Goods Sold
3. Define Additional Quantity Fields
This customizing helps you having additional quantity fields in your transactions and reporting.
Path: IMG à Controlling à General Controlling à Additional Quantities à Define additional quantities
# Conclusion
Has Account Based COPA Evolved Enough to be Recommended?
Having jotted down all the points I am not very comfortable to advise a manufacturing organization to implement account based COPA over costing based COPA. There are many values need to be taken to COPA starting from sales order and many of them are statistical too (though for this also workaround is there in Account Based COPA, like create extra condition types with GL postings to FI twice during billing which will post to COPA and it won’t have impact on the FI. Later on select required data in the COPA reporting).
I have discussed this scenario and my experience with SAP on this matter in one of my blog on SAP Community
https://blogs.sap.com/2018/02/02/first-s4-hana-enterprise-management-implementer-how-it-feels-to-be-...
Secondly comparison sheet is also giving weightage to Costing based COPA, but on the other hand it is also true that all the innovations in S/4HANA will be made available for account based COPA. So, ‘
choose wisely’.