on 09-04-2018 3:02 PM
Hi all,
I hope someone can help me with this. We have a new starter in Ireland payroll and we are not sure if we enter his previous earning details correctly.
The employee started at week 34, but P45 details did not arrived until week 35, so we created IT0387 started day for week 34, and we run payroll for week 35 and we got retro to week 34.
If we see IT0387 previous earning were €10938.09. In week 35, gross in CRT is 964,62. But what we were expecting in CRT for weak 35 is 10938,09+964,62=11902,71. But what we get is the sum of week 34 and week 35, but not previous earning.
Does anyone know if it is right??
Thank you very much!!!
Hi Sikindar,
We have seen that IT0387 must be updated with an "N" in USC Basic field (tab Ireland USC Details). When you run the payroll, CRT is not updated, but we get /405 and /406. These results will be reflect in P60 report (PC00_M11_CPEOY - EOY P60 and P35 returns).
Thank you for your time.
Kr,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Glad to hear that from you, Please close thread if you got the issue
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
PRCL 30 is ticked for respective Wage type right.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
yes, I confirm that results of 34 week is available in CRT of week 35, but what we were expecting is to get sum IT0387 as well. We don't get any results (week 34, 35,..) in RT (or CRT) about this infotype and we don't know when the system reads these results and sum them to CRT. I hope you understand what I mean.
Thank you again!
Hi Sikindar,
In that point, you get this
It looks like nothing has been read. But I checked LPBEG and IT0387 has been correctly read.
The problem that I found is in this part of the code:
because I don't get into that if because lv_sw_ruhend is empty. And this variable is empty because the employee is actived:
so, for me this part doesn't make any sense.
Thank you very much for your help. I'm very grateful 🙂
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
9 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.