on 04-15-2015 9:44 PM
Hello,
I have a question regarding display of cost component break up for product cost. I will explain it with an example -
I have three raw materials, that manufacture a semi-finished item, there are multiple layers of semi-finished items until we get to Finished material. At every level there are raw materials consumed along with corresponding semi-finished item coming from lower level. Accounting wise we have separate consumption accounts for Raw materials and groups of semi finished items.
RM1, RM2, RM3 > SF1
SF1, RM4 > SF2
SF2, RM5 > Finished
Cost components look as follows -
Cot element Cost comp
----------- ----------
Consumption cost element (GL account) 100000 Raw Material
Consumption cost element (GL account) 110000 Intermediates
Consumption cost element (GL account) 120000 Bulk Product
SF1 is associated with Intermediates and SF2 with Bulk Product.
When we roll the cost Cost break up and cost comp split looks as follows
Cost of SF1
Rm1 10
RM2 20
RM3 30
Labor 15
OH 25
Total 100
Cost comp breakup SF1 -
Raw Material 60
Intermediates 0
Bulk Prod 0
Labor 15
OH 25
Total 100
Cost of SF2
SF1 100
RM5 20
Labor 30
OH 10
Total 160
Cost comp breakup SF2 -
Raw Material 80
Intermediates 0
Bulk Prod 0
Labor 45
OH 35
Total 160
We were expecting the breakup to show as -
Cost comp breakup SF2 -
Raw Material 20
Intermediates 100
Bulk Prod 0
Labor 15
OH 25
Total 160
What are we missing?
Thanks in advance for your responses.
- Subodh
Hi Subodh
It seems you have activated the "Cost Roll Up" indicator for each cost component in OKTZ. With this, system behaves as it is doing now
I feel that is correct and thats how it should be because that gives you the PURE raw material cost at any level. Tomorrow if you have to take a Make or Buy decision for SFG, you should know how much is pure RM cost and how much is OH.. System currently is giving you that info
If you dont want that, try to deactivate the Cost Roll Up button and check. But i would advise strongly against it
Br, Ajay M
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Paul, Kamal and Ajay, Thanks for your responses.
I have not tried switching structure yet, as I was looking at the 'Cost roll up' option. With that option it compels me to mark Inventory valuation and Cost of goods manufactured as 'Not Relevant' which does not sound like a good idea - not sure if I am missing something. After doing so, I observed that the cost calculated for materials up in the hierarchy is lesser. I am still testing this and will be able to share the results appropriately later today.
In the meantime, I wanted to ask whether it's possible have main cost component structure in a standard way and auxiliary structure without 'Cost roll up'? I am not completely familiar with Auxiliary Cost component option, but I believe it will give me another view of the cost. Let me know if this makes sense.
Thanks again for your responses. As I said above, I will share my observations later today.
Regards,
Subodh
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.