ISU Equipment Location is not updated

[vapor_anomaly]

Hi,

We have a situation where we install two devices to the same device location using FM ISU_S_WORKLIST_INSTALL.

For the first device the Location is appearing in 'Location tab' of IQ03.

But for the the second device the Location is not appearing in the Location tab of IQ03.

We use the same code to update both.

One difference we noticed is that in ILOA-STORTI, the value is 'R' (Data transfer from reference object) for the first device, and 'D' (Field maintained directly. No data transfer) for the second device. And we are not passing this anywhere in the FM call.

Can anyone let us know how this R / D is determined? Is there any configuration or any default template being used by SAP?

Thank you.

[peter_atkin]

Joshua,

Go into IE03 for each device and navigate to the Location tab, then use menu Edit-->Data Origin List to determine where the data is defaulted from.

https://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/67/79bb53707db44ce10000000a174cb4/frameset.htm

PeteA

[vapor_anomaly]

Hi Peter,

We checked this.

When we navigate to Data Origin List we get a message 'No data origin defined for any of the fields displayed'.

Note:

When we installed the first device and then checked in IE03, it did display a table where Location was set as "Maintained Manually".

After we installed the second device, to the same site, when we check IE03, we get the message 'No data origin defined for any of the fields displayed'.

Is there anything we are missing?

Thanks.

Joshua.

[Former Member]

Joshua.

Can you show a screenshot of the full error message text (including message number)?

PeteA

[vapor_anomaly]

Hi Pete,

Below is the screenshot of the error.

Thanks.

[peter_atkin]

Joshua,

Try opening an OSS Message to SAP to see what they recommend.

PeteA

[NTeunckens]

Even though related to a BAPI rather than FM "ISU_S_WORKLIST_INSTALL", SAP-KBA 1704117 "... updates the data origin fields ... with unexpected values" mentions how the "Data origin Fields" are filled. I'm guessing the same goes for this Function ...

[vapor_anomaly]

Hi,

We will check this.

So far, when we look at the calls to install the two devices, we haven't noticed any differences.

Thanks,

Joshua.

[rakesh_mane]

Hello

While using FM you are passing reference object for both devices ?

Please maintain the reference object while using the FM.Then check.

Br

Rakesh