on 10-10-2022 9:44 AM
Hello,
in the context of implementing change management for dual system landscape based on Focused Build and classic change management, I would like to ask you about the best practices, how is it best to organize.
I have already seen some recommendations in SAP slides, like here:
But still there is no overall guideline how to implement this in details.
Can anyone share your practical experience?
I would also be interested in the following questions:
- Why can't you actually use Fix Pace for a dual landscape together with Retrofit, as SAP claims? What is preventing this from the technical side? After all, behind it are the same transports.
- Just on the quoted picture it is suggested to use ToCs in Retrofit. How are they to be handled in the project landscape? How do I transport of a ToC from DEV to QAS? I guess I need a WP and a WI. And what about the PRD in that case? I can't transport the ToCs to PRD on cutover.
- In general, how do I use the retrofit in case of the project track based on Focused Build: do I always need to prepare a WP and WI with the whole approval process in advance or are there other ways?
Thank you very much for your answers.
Best Regards
Sergey Dorokhov
Thank you very much for your reply. Your suggestion is quite interesting. But for the first time I don't see any advantage to Dual Track.
And the question remains whether I can fulfill the scenario with the Focused Build alone?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
69 | |
8 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.