So for the people that have been looking for my participation in the QM area and here in general, I thought I'd throw up this blog.
Life just got in the way this year. Nothing really bad. Maybe a little burn out. so some things had to go on th...
Ok. I haven't written many blogs. But I'm going to try to do more. And yes. I'm going to include a bunch of stuff that might not even be SAP related at times.
So in my personal time, many know I'm involved in running a K9 search and rescue team. ...
This is an update from my last Blog It Forward - Craig Snyder - original
I went back to the original post and fixed some links that were broken.
Thank you tammy.powlas3 for tagging me. (I think).
Tammy's blog it forward Part 2 is here: Tammy - Pa...
We are looking at using material determination to help phase out an old material and replace it with a new material number.
I.e. we need to change a material number. The new material and old material are pretty much identical. (basically changing s...
We are using physical samples. There is an addon structure for stability sample for the QPRS structure. The .APPEND structure QSTQPRS0001. It contains the following fields.
PRIMPACKSTABICONEINGDTEINLDTAUSLDT
We are trying to update the fields EIN...
1) Avg. insp duration should be a subset value < GR processing time that is on the QM plant view page.2) The insp. lot start date depends on the inspection type.Unless otherwise specified the start date is = to the insp. lot creation date.For 04 insp...
Please try changing the "control insp. lot" setting to "For each material document" and let us know what happens.You indicate that its able to do the early inspection lot creation. The way you wrote the question, I'm wondering if you expect both an ...
Disclaimer: This is only a suggestion of a possibility. I have not tested this, or tried this.In your example, make MIC_1 a required characteristic and setup your catalogs like normal.Make MIC_2, MIC_3, MIC_4... etc.. all optional.Create a custom s...
The short answer is yes.But see Albert's response above!And are you talking about a two step inspection process? Or possibly a two step release process (UD)?Craig
So keep in mind, this process is only related to whether a physical COA was received when the shipment arrived. Is that a requirement? If so, it should be on the GR level. I mean, how is your dock person to know if the vendor batch was receipted be...